The Octopus
Thursday, December 29th, 2005Have you ever wondered why Bill Gates is named the richest man on earth? Wait, wait. You don’t know Bill Gates? You are probably using his software now, and you don’t know about him? Check out this web site first before going on reading: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Gates.
Okay, so now you know who he is. Now, the story began last night when I tried to patch my cracked WinXP with this Service Pack 1 (SP1) (okay, so I’m talking technical here, but don’t get discouraged. It’s not my point here). The process took about a few minutes before my box popped up a message saying that the product key is invalid bla bla bla…
Alas, I said. I have copied the SP1 from the server at my office but it didn’t work on my PC at home. So, today I tried to find sources on how to resolve the problem. I ran into this forum for geeks discussing about Window$ (nope, it’s not typo, I intendedly put $ there). Check this out: http://www.geek.com/news/geeknews/2002Sep/gee20020903016151.htm.
There are pros and cons on, not only WinXP, but also Microsoft as a company. I couldn’t help agreeing with those who despise the company octopus. If you are among those who are bedazzled by the glittering gimmick and visual art of Window$ XP and other Micro$oft products, you might as well be not geek as those guys in the forum who are pros with WinXP.
Before you decide to comment on my article, see this in my point of view. Imagine there’s a person who thought he’s smart. He’s name was Bill Gates. He could write computer programs. Then, he decided to make a computer program (Operating System, to be technical speaking) by copying visual arts like what Mac has (don’t believe me? Read the history: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Microsoft_Windows). Anyway, as you can see nowadays he makes money more than any one in this world.
How? It’s like this. First, he wrote computer programs (I will use the term OS hereafter). Then he opened market for his product under the flag of Microsoft Corporation. He charged people who used his software as expensive as possible. Then, afterwards, he plants bugs and everything in it: security hole, bugs, glicthes, and whatever so that people will have to download SP1 to patch the poor OS. Then, while installing the SP1, it checks for the validity of the product key which is required for the SP1 to be installed. Bill Gates thought he’s smart and that no one will ever hack into the program. Welp, it’s Bill Gates against hackers. And hackers just done it well. There is another way round to the problem.
So, if you actually DO buy Microsoft software, I should salute you. You just made Bill Gates even richer. You might want to notice the total cost of ownership (TCO) of Micro$oft is actually very expensive. Start from buying the OS (approx. USD 1k), the M$ Office (approx. another USD 1k), then the time you must spend on downloading Service Packs, then the time and cost you must spend on calling the technical support, and other b******t. But, hey, that’s what happens only if you buy the software.
Get the warez/ cracked one? You are prone to crime action. But hey, people use it anyway. In our country, it’s like heaven here. People can go to specific area and buy pirated software. Don’t get me wrong, it’s not like we are all criminal here. I see foreigners (westerners, white people) also buy pirated software. Who wouldn’t want to? For USD5 you can get a copy of the latest WinXP! And the business continues.
I’m amazed at those people who are like the soldiers of Bill Gates. I’m really not surprised if they are actually employee of the company. I mean, why would people defend the bug-infested software?